Billions around the world lack safe water, proper sanitation facilities, reveals UN report

12 July 2017 – Some three in ten people around the world lack access to safe and readily available water at home, and almost six in ten to safely managed sanitation, a new United Nations report has warned, calling on countries to do more to fulfil these basic human needs.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF) joint report, Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and Sustainable Development Goal Baselines, many homes, healthcare facilities and schools also lack soap and water for handwashing, putting the health of all people &#8211 but especially young children &#8211 at risk for deadly diseases.

&#8220Safe water, sanitation and hygiene at home should not be a privilege of only those who are rich or live in urban centres,&#8221 Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the WHO Director-General, said in a news release, announcing the findings and noting that those living in rural areas are the worst affected.

As a result of lack of these basic services, millions fall ill to diseases &#8211 that could, otherwise, have been easily prevented &#8211 such as diarrhoea which claims the lives of 361,000 children under the age of five die, every year, noted the UN agencies.

&#8220Safe water, effective sanitation and hygiene are critical to the health of every child and every community &#8211 and thus are essential to building stronger, healthier, and more equitable societies,&#8221 underscored Anthony Lake, the Executive Director of UNICEF.

‘Significant’ inequalities persist

Safe water, sanitation and hygiene at home should not be a privilege of only those who are rich WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus

Good hygiene is one of the simplest and most effective ways to prevent the spread of diseases such as diarrhoea, cholera, dysentery, hepatitis A, and typhoid.

However, findings in the report revealed that access to water and soap for handwashing varies immensely in the 70 countries with available data, from 15 per cent of the population in sub-Saharan Africa to 76 per cent in western Asia and northern Africa.

These significant inequalities also put the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), in particularGoal 6 on ensuring availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all at risk.

Backed by the data, the two UN agencies also warned that in as many as 90 countries around the world, progress towards basic sanitation is too slow, &#8220meaning they will not reach universal coverage by 2030&#8221.

In addition, hundreds of millions without even ‘basic’ drinking water

According to the report, of the 2.1 billion people who do not have safely managed water, 844 million do not have even a basic drinking water service.

This includes 263 million people who have to spend over 30 minutes per trip collecting water from sources outside the home, and 159 million who still drink untreated water from surface water sources, such as streams or lakes.

As we improve these services in the most disadvantaged communities and for the most disadvantaged children today, we give them a fairer chance at a better tomorrowUNICEF Executive Director Anthony Lake

Furthermore, of the 4.5 billion people who do not have safely managed sanitation, 2.3 billion still do not have basic sanitation services, including nearly 600 million people who share a toilet or latrine with other households, and 892 million people &#8211 mostly in rural areas &#8211 who defecate in the open.

Improvements these services, are therefore essential not only for realizing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and giving the most vulnerable a chance at a better future.

&#8220As we improve these services in the most disadvantaged communities and for the most disadvantaged children today, we give them a fairer chance at a better tomorrow,&#8221 said Mr. Lake.

In the same vein, Mr. Ghebreyesus underscored: &#8220These are some of the most basic requirements for human health, and all countries have a responsibility to ensure that everyone can access them.&#8221

Taskforce to support Tesco workers meets for first time

Tesco announced last month that it planned to close its Customer Contact Centre in Llanishen, Cardiff with the potential loss of 1100 jobs. 

In response, Economy Secretary, Ken Skates pledged to establish a Taskforce to ensure that workers affected by this news could access the very best support.  

And today the Economy Secretary chaired the very first meeting of the Taskforce and was joined by the Minister for Skills and Science, Julie James, representatives of Careers Wales, the Welsh Contact Centre Forum, DWP, Public Health Wales, Trade Unions and Welsh Government officials to discuss the practical support that could be given to workers to mitigate the impact of this decision.

Ken Skates said: 

“News of Tesco’s proposal to close its Llanishen contact centre has come as a devastating blow and our priority now must be to support those workers affected.  

“I am confident that the establishment of a Taskforce – which is a tried and tested approach and was hugely helpful in assisting workers affected by the Murco closure in Pembrokeshire –  will enable us to pool our resources and provide first class support to the 1100 Tesco staff who face losing their jobs.

“I am pleased to welcome a range of partners to today’s meeting. Collectively we will do all we can to support affected worker to find new employment, to  retrain and upskill, and to access any health and well being support they need. This will include reaching out to local employers and examining how we can assist them with their recruitment. 

“Let’s not forget these are highly skilled and award winning workers.  This Taskforce is committed to working collectively to ensure that the impact of Tesco’s decision on those workers’ lives is kept to an absolute minimum.”

At the meeting, Taskforce delegates agreed to establish four work streams to help provide targeted and effective support. 

The Training and Skills work stream will look at the skills needs of staff facing redundancy and will include representatives from USDAW, Careers Wales and Jobcentre Plus. 

The Business Support work stream will look at the skills and recruitment needs of employers and consider support that can be given to   encourage them to employ displaced Tesco employees. This work stream will include representation from Business Wales, the Welsh Contact Centre Forum and Welsh Government officials. 

The Health work stream will gather and share information on the personal support available to workers and their families and ensure that such support is accessible. It will include representatives from Public Health Wales and USDAW. 

Finally the Research work stream will look at the key risks and trends in the call centre sector including the impact of technological developments . It will be co-ordinated by the Welsh Government’s Knowledge and Analytical Services. 

Speech: Secretary of State for Transport addresses the Aviation Club Lunch

Thank you.

It’s an honour to continue the tradition of Transport Secretaries addressing the Aviation Club Lunch.

Following Patrick Mcloughlin in 2014.

And Philip Hammond in 2011.

There’s a reason why, when a Secretary of State for Transport is invited to this occasion, the answer tends to be yes.

And it’s not just because of the haute cuisine.

It’s because if you want to speak to the broadest possible cross-section of the aviation community this is the occasion to do it.

Airlines and airports, yes.

But also aviation finance houses.

Aerospace manufacturers, air traffic controllers, air travel agents, freight shippers and aviation consultancies of all kinds.

And that in itself tells a story.

Very few countries could convene such a depth of aviation expertise and experience.

We remain one of the world’s leading aviation nations.

And that is, in large part, because we are heirs to a great aviation legacy.

A legacy in which this industry has pioneered new technologies and new business models.

The UK was at the forefront of the expansion of international air services in the 1920s.

In the wake of the Second World War we shaped the international civil aviation framework, and developed the first commercial jets.

Later, UK aviation led the way to the liberalisation of the global air travel market and to low cost travel.

So this industry has made a colossal contribution to this country, and indeed the world.

And that is something in which we should take pride.

But we must not take it for granted.

This industry will thrive into the future only if it continues to focus on its customers, to receive investment, to adapt, and to pioneer new technologies and new business models.

This afternoon I’d like to set out some of the things we are doing to support the industry, and your customers, as you do just that.

Heathrow

First, let me talk about Heathrow.

In recent weeks there’s been speculation about why the third runway wasn’t included in the Queen’s Speech.

So let me clear that up.

The Queen’s Speech sets out the government’s proposed legislation for the session ahead.

And there’s a basic reason why the third runway wasn’t included.

Not because it’s been dropped.

Not because Parliament doesn’t support it.

But simply because getting it built doesn’t require any new primary legislation.

Our commitment to the third runway is as strong as ever.

Right now, we are reviewing the many responses to the consultation on the draft Airports National Policy Statement.

Of course it needs to be done right.

We’re not interested in expansion at any cost.

But the right scheme at the right price

We want a plan that keeps landing charges as close as possible to current levels.

And we would expect passengers’ fares to come down, even after taking into account the cost of construction, thanks to the increased competition a new runway would allow.

Once the final National Policy Statement has been published, Heathrow will follow the set legal process for obtaining planning permission.

And there is wide support across Parliament.

Yes — because of the new domestic links the runway can provide.

But also because of what it means for the future of our country.

Consider that great aviation legacy I was talking about just now.

It would all too be easy to sit and watch our big airports slide down the international rankings as flights and investment head elsewhere.

Yet what starts as a slow trickle can quickly become a haemorrhage.

We haven’t reached that stage yet.

But to ensure we never do we must progress with our programme to expand Heathrow — and so provide room for the industry to grow for decades to come.

Aviation strategy

Of course, we also need to make progress in other areas.

It’s been 4 years since the government published its aviation policy framework.

Perhaps the most important legacy of that framework is that it set the principles the Davies’ Commission took into account in working up its recommendations.

But things have moved on.

So we will shortly publish a new aviation strategy.

It’s an opportunity to look at what the government can do for the sector and, above all, its customers.

It will set the long-term direction for aviation policy to 2050.

It will look at the challenges facing the industry.

And the opportunities.

But its overriding aim will be to put the customer at the centre of aviation policy.

That’s because if this industry is getting customer service right, you’re likely to be getting much else right too.

So it will be an aviation strategy that puts the customer first.

But we’re also going to look at:

  • safety and security
  • growing our global connections
  • encouraging competition
  • embracing new technology
  • building a skilled workforce
  • and supporting growth while reducing aviation’s negative effects, including on our airports’ neighbours and the wider environment

We will shortly publish a green paper setting out our aviation strategy in draft.

The aim is to stimulate debate.

And we want to hear from airlines, airports, the aerospace sector, freight customers, passengers and the public about how we can support this industry, those it serves, and those who are affected by it.

In 2018 we will publish a final white paper setting out our plans.

Of course, that doesn’t mean no decisions will be made until then.

Where something is clearly the right thing to do we will get on with it.

Airspace modernisation

A case in point is our drive to modernise the way we manage our airspace.

Earlier this year we held a consultation on how we can make better use of this critical piece of national infrastructure.

Like much of the rest of our infrastructure, it is increasingly congested.

Our aircraft are fitted with the latest satellite navigation technology, but our airspace arrangements are half a century old.

Without action, by 2030 total delays due to inefficient use of airspace capacity could be 70 times more than in 2015.

We’d be looking at 1 in 3 UK flights departing over 30 minutes late.

This wouldn’t just be damaging for passengers.

But also for local residents — as noisy waiting planes will continue to be held needlessly in stacks above urban areas.

So I am glad that our proposals for the modernisation of the way we use our airspace have received a strong response.

We are currently reviewing those responses, and are on track to publish our final plans in the autumn.

Brexit

That’s a broad overview of what this government is doing to support the industry and its customers.

Holding the course on Heathrow.

Shaping a new customer-focused aviation strategy.

And modernising our airspace.

But I couldn’t finish today without touching on the political issue of the moment.

Our plans for exiting the European Union, and what they could mean for the future of this industry.

Now, I know that the aviation industry wants certainty, and quickly.

So does the government.

So does the rest of the EU.

It’ll be some time yet before we can deliver that certainty.

The formal negotiations have only just begun.

But one of our priorities is to secure the best possible access to European aviation markets.

We are also working hard to deliver another priority — the quick replacement of the EU-based third country agreements, with countries such as the US and Canada.

And although — just as for the rest of the economy — we have to wait until these various negotiations are concluded, we ought to be confident.

Our aviation market is the biggest in Europe.

It serves millions of EU nationals and every year carries millions of UK holidaymakers to EU destinations.

It’s in the interests of all countries, and all who travel between them, that we seek open, liberal arrangements for aviation.

Long-term prospects for aviation

Yet even if we have entered what we might call a pocket of turbulence the prospects for this industry remain strong.

Earlier this year, PWC published a detailed report, looking at how the global economic order will change by 2050.

They forecast that:

  • over the period to 2050, the UK will be the fastest growing economy of the G7
  • in that time, we should grow faster than the EU average
  • and that we should do better than other big economies, such as France and Germany.

Clearly, that growth is going to create new demand for international travel.

But it is also predicated on more international travel.

As PWC’s report makes clear this future growth requires deeper links with the world’s other fast-growing economies, many of which are not on our doorstep.

That’s why in the years ahead the aviation industry will be so important.

And why it will remain central to the government’s plans for our country.

Conclusion

So in conclusion, the government has sought to end the decades of dithering and delay in aviation policy.

We have addressed the capacity question.

We are changing how we manage our airspace.

There may be challenges ahead, and obstacles to overcome.

But we will join you in meeting those challenges.

Just as we have met the challenges of the past — and come out stronger as a result.

Thank you.

30,538 investigated for duty crimes in 1st half of 2017

A total of 30,538 Chinese officials were investigated for work-related crimes in the first half of 2017, according to a seminar for chief procurators on Wednesday.

The number came from 29 provinces, with Beijing, Shanxi and Zhejiang, the pilot provinces and regions for the reform of the monitoring system excluded, marking a 19.6-percent year-on-year increase from last year.

Of the total, 1,505 of the investigated were on county level, while another 224 were on bureau level for committing duty crimes including bribery and misconduct.

Up to 1,650 officials among those investigated were related to duty crimes in poverty alleviation work, up 81.7 percent on a yearly basis, as a result of the stronger hand against the crimes in poverty relief over the past six months.

Also, 495 were investigated and punished for work-related crimes that led to accidents with serious consequences.

News story: Lakeview Developments Limited

Lakeview Developments Limited (company number 05263760) is pleased to announce that it has agreed terms with the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (formerly Business, Innovation and Skills) (the Secretary of State) to compromise the petition presented by the Secretary of State for the compulsory winding up of the company on public interest grounds pursuant to Section 124a of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the Petition). The petition has been dismissed as part of Comprehensive Terms of Settlement (terms of settlement) which include that the company was to be placed in to Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation and undertakings to the Court and conditions have been agreed between the company and the Secretary of State which are considered, on balance to be in the public interest.

The Secretary of State had contended in the petition that the Company had:

  • carried on business in an objectionable manner and alleged that the company had made misleading statements concerning the prospects of obtaining planning permission inducing the purchase of plots of land that had no prospect of gaining planning permission. The Secretary of State had also contended that the subdivision of the original site into numerous plots which were subsequently sold as plots, primarily to members of the public, has negatively impacted on a) the likelihood that there could be a development of the site or of individual plots and b) planning permission being granted which has, in the Secretary of State’s opinion, resulted in the plots being near valueless
  • carried on business without a Consumer Credit Act (CCA) licence when one was required

The company strenuously denied (and continues to deny) the alleged wrongdoing. Specifically:

  • the company denied having made misleading statements which allegation the company said was unsupported by any documentary evidence and were contrary to the contracts signed by purchasers of the plots of land and the sub-division was both obvious and may have enhanced the prospects for planning permission for particular plots
  • that it did not provide credit which required a CCA licence

The company regrets if any purchaser of a plot considers they were misled into purchasing a plot.

Terms of settlement have been agreed to compromise the petition and has been agreed by the company and the Secretary of State which included that the company was placed into Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation with undertakings being given by the company, its director, Mr Baron Alexander Deschauer, and other associated companies to prevent the future sales being conducted in the manner which the Secretary of State has complained of. The terms of settlement also sets out how plot purchasers will be treated in the liquidation and includes an undertaking from the director of the company who will make a voluntary contribution to the company.

Plot purchasers can contact the Joint Liquidators, Mark Newman and Vincent John Green, for further information at CCW Recovery Solutions, 4 Mount Ephraim Road, Tunbridge Wells, Kent, TN1 1EE. The Secretary of State has no reason to consider that Mr Newman and Mr Green are other than proper and appropriate persons to act as liquidators.