Book highlights Xi’s seven years in Shaanxi village

A newly published book of the seven years that President Xi Jinping spent at a poor village four decades ago has gained popularity soon after its debut, with many analysts saying the book is encouraging and enlightening.

A customer reads Xi Jinping's Seven Years as an Educated Youth in Wangfujing Bookstore in Beijing on Sunday. [Photo by Zhu Xingxin/China Daily]

A customer reads Xi Jinping’s Seven Years as an Educated Youth in Wangfujing Bookstore in Beijing on Sunday. [Photo by Zhu Xingxin/China Daily]

The book, Xi Jinping’s Seven Years as an Educated Youth, was a collection of interviews with people who used to live and work with Xi when he was a zhiqing, or educated youth, in Liangjiahe village, Yanchuan county, Shaanxi province, from 1969 to 1975.

Zhiqing refers to urban youths sent to the countryside for “re-education” amid late chairman Mao Zedong’s campaign for urban youth to experience rural labor during the “cultural revolution” (1966-76). Xi was only 15 when he was sent to Liangjiahe in early 1969.

The book was brought out by the Publishing House of the Party School of the CPC Central Committee.

He Yiting, executive vice-president of the Party School of the CPC Central Committee, said Liangjiahe was Xi’s first stop to get into society, and his life in the village had a great influence on him.

After its debut last week, the book became so popular that the publishing house staff has been working around the clock to meet demand, he said at a seminar on Sunday to discuss the book.

The book is a vivid text for young people to set up a positive outlook on their lives, and it also tells Party officials of all levels about how to act in accordance with the Party’s discipline, he added.

In the book, 29 people were interviewed, including some other “educated youths” who worked with Xi in the village and Liangjiahe villagers who worked with Xi for years. They recalled how Xi strove to help farmers and remain optimistic about life in the difficult period.

For example, Zhang Weipang, a Liangjiahe farmer, said in the book that “no matter how bad the food was, Jinping would have a good appetite, and no matter how poor a person was, Jinping would never despise him”. In another story, a villager recalled how Xi helped him find a lost pig-the most valuable asset of the poor family.

During his time in the poverty-stricken village, Xi led villagers to accomplish various things, such as building the first methane-generating pit in north Shaanxi to improve the peoples’ livelihood. His down to earth spirit won the recognition of and compliments from the villagers.

“I found myself easily traveling several kilometers of mountain road while carrying a shoulder pole weighing more than 50 kilograms,” Xi said in a previous interview with China Central Television.

Tao Haisu, who used to work with Xi as a zhiqing at Liangjiahe, said at the seminar that “the sweat that Xi shed with the people” has deep and great influence on the president’s thoughts.

“If you understand Xi’s experience at Liangjiahe, you will understand the measures he had taken after the 18th National Congress of the Party, and you will know why he deeply hates the corrupt officials who bully the people,” he said.

Xuan Yong, Party secretary of Zhejiang International Studies University, said at the seminar that the book is enlightening for young people, and the university will arrange for students to read the book.

The university also will dispatch volunteers to Liangjiahe during next year’s summer holiday to elaborate on the stories of Xi for those who visit the village, he said, adding that the president’s spirit of keeping firm belief at difficult times should be learned by the nation’s youth.

Liu Dawei, assistant minister of education, said that by looking back at the history in the book, readers will be much more confident about the future of the country.

Doorstop with the NSW Minister for Police and Minister for Emergency Services, AFP Commissioner and NSW Police Commissioner

PRIME MINISTER: Well good afternoon. I’m joined today by Troy Grant the New South Wales Minister for Police, David Elliott, the New South Wales Minister for Counter-Terrorism, Andrew Colvin the Federal Police Commissioner, Mick Fuller the New South Wales Police Commissioner and Tony Sheehan the Commonwealth Counter-Terrorism Coordinator.

After the Nice truck attack last year, I asked the Counter-Terrorism Coordinator for the Commonwealth who was then Greg Moriarty, to get together with all of the State and Territory Police agencies, with business and local Government and make sure that we had a comprehensive strategy for protecting crowded places. Particularly with respect to vehicle attacks, but not exclusively obviously. Offenders with guns or knives or bombs or chemical devices are also a threat, it’s a full range of threats. But what Nice demonstrated was the lethality of somebody using a truck in a crowded place.

Since then we’ve seen a number of attacks with vehicles. Of course tragically here in Australia in the Bourke Street Mall, in the UK on several occasions, most recently in the London Bridge attack where tragically young Australian’s were killed. Now, the last few days we’ve seen the shocking attack in Barcelona where once again Australians have been injured. As you know we are concerned about a young Australian boy who is unaccounted for. Again as I said yesterday, our prayers go out to all the victims but we pray for that little boy, that he will be found and restored alive to his parents. But it is a very tragic circumstance and one of great risk.

Now what we’ve done with this crowded places strategy, is we have set out a series of tools which owners and operators of venues, whether it is a council, a sporting arena, whether it is a state government site or a federal government site, we’re able to assess the vulnerability of the site, see how they can make it safer, know where to seek advice from police.

We’ve just walked through the Pitt Street Mall. As Commissioner Fuller was pointing out, you can see there the bollards at each end of that mall that make it safe from vehicle attack. So all of the people in that mall, that large open space are perfectly safe from vehicle attack. But that’s been done in a way that does not diminish the amenity for those pedestrians. We also of course recognise that the best mitigations are done at the design stage. Clearly you can’t proof every site 100 per cent, there are certainly there things that can be done to existing sites, but the most important thing is as you get new developments, new plans that security measures are put in place at that time.

So this is a comprehensive strategy. It’s one that has been done with cooperation between all the state and territory agencies and the commonwealth. It is available online at nationalsecurity.gov.au and it’s one that I believe is going to be very important as we work tirelessly to keep Australians safe. There is no place for ‘set and forget’.

Just before I hand over to the New South Wales Minister for Police, I just want to acknowledge again the outstanding work that is done by our police and intelligence agencies. As you know just a few weeks ago, the Federal Police and New South Wales Police and ASIO successfully disrupted, contained a terrorist plot to bring down an aeroplane. That was here in Sydney. Today you will have seen arrests of three persons in Melbourne, again the consequence of the Joint Counter-Terrorism Team cooperation, who will be charged with terrorist acts against a Shiite mosque in Melbourne last year. So you can see that we are relentlessly, tirelessly working to keep Australians safe. There is no place for set and forget.

Every day we are improving the tools, whether they are legislative or technical that our agencies have to keep us safe. So I’ll ask Troy to say a few words and we’re happy to take questions.

NEW SOUTH WALES MINISTER FOR POLICE: Thank you Prime Minister and good afternoon everybody. The New South Wales Government thanks the Prime Minister for leading this body of work. An important part of our ability to continue to keep the community safe. Public safety is paramount and every city and every community in New South Wales and right cross Australia. The New South Wales Government, supported by our police, have had significant involvement in the construct of this information for crowded places. For this plan and what has been developed has been is a very important toolkit.

It is well thought through, it will be an evolutionary document, something that will continue to evolve, be well-informed by not only our law enforcement partners, but our intelligence community and the broader community as well. So for businesses, local Government, state and federal government, this is the greatest opportunity we have to work collectively, to utilise this tool kit, to make our communities as safe as possible against the ever emerging and evolving threats.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister you mentioned [inaudible] since then, did the authorities make it clear [inaudible] barriers and bollards? Especially since all sorts of governments are already doing that, including Sydney and Melbourne?

PRIME MINISTER: Well this strategy has been a process that in the course of putting it together, has been informing local authorities. Of course, everyone has been aware for these threats. But it’s important to bring all that together. This is where the Federal Government can provide leadership and coordination. That’s why Tony Sheehan, there’s Tony, who is the Commonwealth Counter-Terrorism Coordinator, we can bring all of that expertise, all of that experience together to make sure that everybody is as well-informed and has the tools they need to keep us safe.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister you said there was design put into this, where it’s morbid to see deliberate structures and you know what they are, to what extent will they blend into the environment, become part of the infrastructure? 

PRIME MINISTER: Well you can see very good examples of that and they’re set out in the Strategy document, where you can have, look you can obviously have bollards. We’re familiar with those. You can have seating. You might have noticed some of the seating in the Pitt Street Mall is positioned in a way that it would provide a barrier to a vehicle attempting to enter the mall. You can have works of art. You can have steps, you can have planter boxes. There’s a range of measures that can be built in at the design stage, it can be done very unobtrusively. Would you like to add to that Tony?

COUNTER-TERRORISM COORDINATOR: Thank you Prime Minister. There are many options available to owners and operators, in some cases we would see, as we do see around Sydney and in other cities around Australia, very visible bollards and other barriers. But one important thing that the Prime Minister has referenced is opportunities in the design phase as well. Where there are steps taken around security in the design phase in our crowded places, we can see very effective measures taken which can also be very attractive in the build of what we have in our crowded places.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister it would be fair to say, wouldn’t it, that this is about being proactive rather than reactive? Just being –

PRIME MINISTER: Yes, this work has been underway for a year. It’s been finalised recently, it’s been discussed at COAG. All of the jurisdictions, all of the states and territories are very familiar with it. So this is a part of our continuous program of optimising, improving the way we can keep Australians safe.

Our agencies are the best in the world. I’m so proud of our police, our security services, our intelligence services, our Defence Force. They’re the best in the world, but we recognise that the threat is constantly evolving. So what we have to do is make sure that we too are constantly improving and updating the measures we have to keep Australians safe.

JOURNALIST: I assume this will be a costly exercise, will government help businesses at all?

PRIME MINISTER: The responsibility goes to the owners of the particular venues and locations but of course most of the crowded places locations, or many of them, many of the biggest ones belong to governments, whether it’s state governments or local governments and in some cases federal government. But the important thing is that you’ve got tools in the documents there that people will be able to download now I’m sure, which enable an assessment of the risk of a particular site. That will then give the opportunity to then seek specific advice from police. Perhaps Mick do you want to say a little bit about how you would operate if somebody goes through that checklist and says: “Well I’ve got a venue that I think could be vulnerable,” how would you react to that? What’s the help you can give?

NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE COMMISSIONER: Thanks Prime Minister. I think that one of the important parts of the document is that it’s to stop ‘one size fits all’ in this, it’s not just a football stadium, it’s not just Pitt Street Mall. It’s there to highlight.  Crowded places could be just one day of the year, it could be just Anzac Day in your local town. At the same time it’s about not just asking for the community to be part of this, looking for suspicious bags, it’s about what can security and your people that work in these private assets do, to hopefully identify a threat at the earliest opportunity? So there’s a risk assessment process in there. There are potentially people out there now who have an asset that is a crowded place that don’t assess it in that way. So this document will give you a great deal of consistency in relation to private, local government, government departments, all risk-assessing these individual spaces in the same way.

Now the wonderful thing about the document is it gives different people different solutions to minimise opportunity. So I think in the past, law enforcement or government has asked the community and the media to be an important part of prevention in terrorism. But what we’re doing now is tying in local businesses, local government, to all be on the same page.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister for a long time now you’ve been advising people not to change their behavior.  [inaudible] their first response is fear. So, what are you telling them?

PRIME MINISTER: We will never be cowed, nor will be bow to terrorism. We will defeat the terrorists. But what we must do of course is take every step we can to protect Australians from the threat of terrorism and terrorist attacks. The changes that we’re talking about here and the strategy, making crowded places, public places more resilient to for example vehicle attacks, are ones that will enhance the amenity of those public spaces.

You know, I never heard anybody for example, say that they down like the Pitt Street Mall because of the bollards. You don’t notice them. They’re there, they’re very effective. It’s important always to recognise that we want to improve the amenity of our public spaces, it is part of our way of life. Getting together, going out, going out shopping. Look at the people we saw just a little while ago in the Pitt Street Mall, there was a family that had come down on the train from the Blue Mountains for a day in the city, a bit of shopping. That’s part of our great Australian way of life. That will always continue and what we’re doing is ensuring it’s secure and can be done safely.

Now there’s no guarantees obviously, but we’re doing everything we can, every day, to keep Australians safe.

JOURNALIST: Mr Colvin I’m wondering what the police input into it was, into what the criteria should be, what considerations, what specific requests you had for this?

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE COMMISSIONER: Thank you for that. A lot of this framework has been drawn upon from what we’ve learned overseas as well. So obviously this isn’t just reacting to what we’re seeing, this is about trying to get ahead of the game and be preventive in our focus. But we’re not in isolation around the world in thinking about these measures. So a large part of our input has been to make sure that the threat environment is well understood, to make sure that where there’s lessons that we can learn from our partners over seas, both our traditional partners and some of our non-traditional partners frankly, then we’re learning them. That’s been integrated into this strategy. So, while a lot of this is very local in nature, this is a layered approach. Of course local state and national level government s need to play a role.

JOURNALIST: How likely is it Commissioner and Prime Minister, that we’ll see a Barcelona-style attack here? Is there any indication that in our own community, jihadis are looking at these tactics that have been used overseas and talking about them or considering them?

AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE COMMISSIONER: The national security level at the moment in Australia is ‘probable’. It’s ‘probable’ for a reason. I think we know that these attacks around the world resonate with those who want to seek to do us harm. They’re low sophistication attacks so we have to work on the basis that it is probable, that’s why the threat level is what it is.

PRIME MINISTER: Can I give you an example? Andrew can add to this if you wish, or Tony. There was a very serious terrorist plot disrupted just before Christmas in Melbourne and the plot involved an improvised explosive device to be detonated in the vicinity of Federation Square in Melbourne, just outside the cathedral there on Christmas Eve. The plan of these conspirators also involved driving vehicles, trying to get vehicles into Federation Square. So we have to work on the assumption that every vector of attack, every type of attack, is potentially under contemplation by those who seek to do us harm. That’s why intelligence is so important. You know you have to operate on so many levels, you’ve got to do everything you can to make crowded places safe, safer and more resilient to these type of attack. But equally intelligence is critical and so when armed with that intelligence, as our Joint Counter-Terrorism Team were here in Sydney a few weeks ago, they were able then to quickly identify the people that were suspected of being involved in this plot and contain them and disrupt the plot and then of course, as you know, there have been charges laid following.

JOURNALIST: You’ve got footy finals coming up, is there any, in light of this report, any changes going to be made to security at those events?

PRIME MINISTER: All of the venues are keenly aware of the security implications, but again, I just might ask the New South Wales Commissioner to add to that, or Troy if you want to speak about it?

NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE COMMISSIONER: In terms of New South Wales and most other states and territories of Australia, we know that big sporting events is certainly a crowded place, it’s probably something more consistent we’ve been used to in the past. We work with asset owners very closely. It’s more than just about bollards and spaces it’s about preparing your staff, it’s about having plans it’s about communicating to ensure that – heaven forbid – if there is an incident, then we are well-trained and well tested to work together with law enforcement, local security and those asset owners. But this document has been worked up with a number of private partners including some of the biggest stadiums, to ensure that it’s not just about a shopping centre, it’s not just about a mall. This document fit every type of crowded place that you can think of, which I think is key.

But we really have changed the way we do business in terms of sporting events now, for some years. We’ll continue to strengthen that through this document.

JOURNALIST: [inaudible]

NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE COMMISSIONER: Absolutely, the document is publically available. Again, in the past we probably trained our security staff to look for a bag left on it’s own; it’s more complex than that. It’s about looking for a person that may be suspicious, maybe sweating profusely for the time of year, dressed inappropriately, carrying a bag that doesn’t fit within the environment. These are the type of things we need to train staff, not just security staff but all staff in assets to be aware of going forward.

JOURNALIST: [Inaudible]

NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE COMMISSIONER: Its about partnerships, isn’t it. We’ve often asked for the community to be a part of the solution. We’ll we’re asking business now, big business and small business also to be part of the solution.

JOURNALIST: You’re also looking at, I think, the trucking industry? I mean there are concerns about the security surrounding trucking.

PRIME MINISTER: Yes, there are and we are working with the trucking industry. Again, I don’t know if Tony or Andrew or Mick would like to talk about that further, but it’s to ensure that people who are not entitled to, not authorised, cannot get access to heavy vehicles because they can clearly be a very potent, lethal mode of attack. Although, you know, you have to recognise that a light van can be very lethal too, as we’ve seen in Barcelona. Indeed in the London Bridge attack, the terrorists had a light van which they loaded sandbags into the back of, to make it heavier so it would have greater and more lethal impact. But big trucks like the one used in Nice for example, they need to ensure that the wrong people are not getting behind the wheels of it. Do you want to add to that?

NEW SOUTH WALES MINISTER FOR POLICE: The New South Wales Government is acutely aware of that risk. A significant body of work is being undertaken with New South Wales Police, Organised Crime Squad as well as CT Command, with the Roads and Maritime Traffic Services and also the WestConnex Project for example. So we’re across that and our agencies are working very harmoniously together.

JOURNALIST: On another matter, yesterday we had an incident up at Chatswood, not terror related. Will that be an area you’d be considering putting bollards in?

NEW SOUTH WALES MINISTER FOR POLICE: This is a matter for every location to go through the risk assessment, go through the audit and then the key to this work is that the police and the experts are then available to you to help advise you. They’re now an additional resources. So one of the key things for me out of this plan is that the agencies, the law enforcement, the intelligence agencies, they understand the risk. Now businesses and operators of venues and local government can be more aware of the risk and the role they can play in mitigating that risk. But they have available to them, the expertise, across every state and territory, of their expert police to advise them as to what measures they will undertake.

JOURNALIST: Are there compliance issues with this? Is it mandatory, do you face fines for not conforming to building standards as you would see for any other building standard?

NEW SOUTH WALES MINISTER FOR POLICE: Those measures are governed by local environmental plans for each of the local government areas. They all have to be compliant with those planning requirements etc. for each jurisdiction.

PRIME MINISTER: Okay thank you all very much. 

Release of Australia’s Strategy for Protecting Crowded Places from Terrorism

Spending time together with family and friends in our sporting stadiums, at major events and around the civic spaces of our wonderful cities is a fundamental part of what makes Australia great.

Unfortunately we are not immune from the global conflicts in the Middle East and the instability around the world. My number one priority is to keep Australians safe.  

As we have seen from tragic events in Paris, London, Berlin and Barcelona, terrorists continue to target crowded places.

Our police and intelligence agencies recently disrupted a terrorist plot in Australia to bring down an aeroplane, further reinforcing the threat.

Last year, a review of lessons learned from terrorist incidents overseas, including the Nice truck attack, found that Australia already had robust arrangements in place to protect crowded places from terrorism.

But when it comes to security, there is no place for set and forget. We continue to reevaluate our arrangements and strengthen them based on changes to the threat environment.

Australia’s Strategy for Protecting Crowded Places from Terrorism has been developed in close partnership with the states and territories, local government, police and the private sector.

The Strategy will assist owners and operators to increase the safety, protection and resilience of crowded places across Australia.

This ‘how to guide’ will strengthen the existing cooperation between government and industry, providing clear guidance on where owners and operators can go for threat information and protective security guidance, and by providing an overview of effective protective security practices.

It includes practical guidance on protective security, information to help owners and operators better understand terrorist weapons and tactics, including ‘active armed offenders,’ improvised explosive devices, chemical weapons, and hostile vehicles.

It is vital that all those responsible for crowded places know where to go for information and advice on how to better protect their sites.   

We cannot be complacent about the threats we face but we will never let the terrorists undermine our way of life or compromise the freedoms we take for granted. Our Strategy will ensure Australians can continue to freely and safely go to the football, enjoy concerts and visit shopping centres.

At the same time, the Commonwealth Government has worked with the states and territories – through the Transport Security Committee – to develop a security awareness guide for truck operators and drivers.

The guide provides information on security measures that drivers and operators can undertake, indicators and warnings to help prevent a terrorist attack, and information on how to report suspicious or criminal behaviour to law enforcement.

The Strategy is now available to owners and operators of crowded places and members of the public on the National Security website – www.nationalsecurity.gov.au.

New Kuomintang chairman reaffirms 1992 Consensus

The new chairman of Taiwan-based Kuomintang acknowledged the one-China policy and firmly opposed “Taiwan independence” on his inauguration ceremony and the party’s 20th plenary congress on Sunday in Taichung.

“Upholding the foundation of the 1992 Consensus, we will firmly oppose ‘Taiwan independence’ and carry forward Chinese culture, promote mutual respect and tolerance and maintain dialogue through economy, culture and the peace forum,” Chairman Wu Den-yih said in his inauguration speech.

The Kuomintang will also work to improve understanding between the two sides, explore peaceful cross-Straits prospects, ensure peace and stability in the region and safeguard the well-being of the people of Taiwan, he said.

Wu was elected KMT chairman on May 20 with 52 percent of the vote.

The meeting on Sunday also approved a new party platform that pledged to oppose “Taiwan independence”.

The KMT will follow the “common aspirations and prospects of cross-Straits peace and development” issued in 2005 by leaders of the Communist Party of China and the KMT as well as the basic principles practiced during the administration of Taiwan’s former leader Ma Ying-jeou.

The party will also push forward all activities conducive to peaceful and stable development of cross-Straits ties, it said.

“Cross-Straits relations are challenging and complicated. Under the common political foundation of upholding the 1992 Consensus, which refers to the one-China policy and opposes ‘Taiwan independence’, we are willing to stay in communication and enhance dialogue with the KMT to maintain peaceful development of cross-Straits relations,” said An Fengshan, spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, China’s Cabinet.

“It is time to have confidence in cross-Straits relations,” said Liu Guoshen, a professor of Taiwan studies at Xiamen University.

He praised the Kuomintang’s acknowledgment of the 1992 Consensus, the one-China principle.

However, he said that the Kuomintang, as a non-ruling party, does not have much say in cross-Straits economic and commercial exchanges.

“Communication between the mainland and the island is insufficient. More communication channels are welcomed,” he said.

Since the Democratic Progressive Party took office in May 2016, it has refused to acknowledge the 1992 Consensus, and official channels of cross-Straits communication have been suspended.

Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen’s reluctance to acknowledge the 1992 Consensus “has damaged all the hard work toward peaceful relations across the Taiwan Straits”, Ma Xiaoguang, another spokesman for the Taiwan Affairs Office of the State Council, has previously said.

Over the past year, the number of mainland tourists visiting Taiwan has sharply declined.

Press release: UK Public Health Rapid Support Team (UK-PHRST) deploys to Sierra Leone

Following natural disasters, outbreaks of water borne diseases such as cholera can occur, particularly where there is a lack of access to clean water and sanitation. Given the scale of the disaster in Freetown, the local capacity to detect and control a disease outbreak is limited and the Government of Sierra Leone has requested international support.

The UK-PHRST team deploying includes experts in tracking the progress of an outbreak (epidemiologists) and diagnosing its cause (microbiologists), as well as a logistician.

The team will be working alongside Sierra Leone health system professionals and other experts in disaster relief to support the Sierra Leone government’s response.

UK-PHRST is jointly run by Public Health England and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine and is funded by the UK government. It continually monitors infectious diseases and other hazards globally, identifying situations where the deployment of specialist expertise could prevent these threats from turning into a global outbreak.

Professor Daniel Bausch, Director of the UK-PHRST said:

Sierra Leone is working to stop a tragedy becoming a major public health issue. Our team of specialists will support its health professionals with enhanced surveillance for water-borne diseases, such as cholera, which often appear in the wake of extreme rainfall and flooding. The people of Sierra Leone have shown extraordinary resilience since the Ebola outbreak and we are working alongside them as we tackle this latest disaster together.

Health Minister Philip Dunne said:

This disaster is a tragedy for Sierra Leone and I am pleased our new rapid support team is helping to protect lives.

In this first bilateral deployment our specialists will save lives on the ground working with local professionals to prevent disease outbreaks. By assisting to halt the spread of disease at the source, not only do we protect those in Sierra Leone but also citizens across the world, including the UK.

International Development Secretary, Priti Patel said:

The UK stands by Sierra Leone in its time of need, stepping up with new emergency support to get food, water and medicine to people who have lost everything.

British expertise is also leading the fight against global health threats ensuring that disease doesn’t take hold in the aftermath of disasters.

The Rapid Support Team is just one way we are helping ensure that countries and the international system are better prepared to effectively tackle the preventable and treatable diseases that still plague countless people today. This will build a safer and healthier world which benefits us all.

As the UK-PHRST’s deployment progresses, it will continue to provide support and share expertise with our partners in Sierra Leone to strengthen the health system beyond the immediate response.

The UK government has remained in Sierra Leone throughout the post-Ebola period, with Public Health England helping to strengthen health systems and further developing the ability to respond to such disasters and prevent outbreaks.

The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine is a world authority in public and global health research, and has been conducting Ebola vaccine trials in Sierra Leone since the outbreak of the virus in West Africa.

UK-PHRST

UK-PHRST consists of public health experts, scientists, academics and clinicians ready to respond to urgent requests from countries around the world within 48 hours to support them in preventing local disease outbreaks from becoming global epidemics.

Informed by surveillance data, the UK-PHRST deploys on behalf of UK Government in response to requests from low- and middle-income countries, as well as with the WHO (World Health Organization) and the Global Outbreak and Response Network (GOARN).

The UK-PHRST has previously deployed members to Ethiopia (outbreak of Acute Watery Diarrhoea) and Nigeria (Meningitis outbreak). These deployments were under the World Health Organization’s Global Outbreak and Response Network (WHO GOARN).

The core team consists of:

  • epidemiologists (experts in tracking the progress of an outbreak)
  • clinical researcher (developing the best clinical response measures)
  • social scientist (community responses to outbreaks)
  • microbiologist (diagnosing the cause of an outbreak)
  • data manager, analyst, systems expert
  • infection prevention and control expert (advising on outbreak control measures)
  • logistician

The consortium of research institutions includes the University of Oxford and King’s College London as academic partners.

Public Health England

Public Health England exists to protect and improve the nation’s health and wellbeing, and reduce health inequalities. It does this through world-class science, knowledge and intelligence, advocacy, partnerships and the delivery of specialist public health services. PHE is an operationally autonomous executive agency of the Department of Health.

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine is a world-leading centre for research and postgraduate education in public and global health, with more than 4,000 students and 1,000 staff working in over 100 countries. The School is one of the highest-rated research institutions in the UK, is among the world’s leading schools in public and global health, and was named University of the Year in the Times Higher Education Awards 2016. Our mission is to improve health and health equity in the UK and worldwide; working in partnership to achieve excellence in public and global health research, education and translation of knowledge into policy and practice.