Politics

image_pdfimage_print

May floundered on her record on police cuts, on funding for our NHS and schools

A Jeremy Corbyn spokesperson, responding to Theresa May’s appearance on the Sky and Channel 4 #BattleForNumber10 debate, said:

“Theresa May floundered on her record on police cuts, on funding for our NHS and schools and on her manifesto policy on social care that didn’t last more than a few days before it was amended with an unspecified cap. It’s no surprise she had no answers because the Tories plan to continue the tax giveaways to the wealthy and big business while offering no new funding for public services.

“There is a clear choice in this election about the kind of country we want Britain to be – between Labour’s plan to transform Britain for the many not the few, and a Conservative Party that has held people back and put its wealthy backers first.”

Ends

read more

Jeremy showed the clear choice on offer in this election is about the kind of country we want Britain to be

A Jeremy Corbyn spokesperson, following the Sky and Channel 4 #BattleForNumber10 debate, said:

“In answering the audience’s questions, Jeremy showed the clear choice on offer in this election is about the kind of country we want Britain to be. The choice is between Labour’s plan to transform Britain for the many not the few, and a Conservative Party that has held people back and put the wealthy first.

“Jeremy was able to talk about our fully-costed manifesto – promises we have made to students to scrap tuition fees, to pensioners to protect their incomes with the triple lock and winter fuel allowance, to families struggling with rising energy costs that we will take back control of the utilities industry and bring down their bills and, crucially, to 95% of taxpayers that we won’t put up their taxes. These are promises Theresa May cannot and will not make.

“Jeremy connects with the public in a way that Theresa May doesn’t  because Labour has a clear plan to transform our economy and society, and people recognise that. Theresa May has hidden from the public during this campaign and run scared of debating Jeremy live on TV, while Jeremy has been travelling around the country meeting people and addressing huge crowds.”

Ends


Notes

In response to the audience questions:

In his interview with Andrew Neil, Jeremy said: “I didn’t support the IRA, I don’t support the IRA. What I want everywhere is a peace process, what I want everywhere is decency and human rights. We went through all the horrors of Northern Ireland, all through the 70s and 80s, through the period of the Troubles, and eventually came from that a peace process, the Good Friday Agreement and now relative peace and stability.”

On the commemoration referred to by the audience member, Jeremy has been very clear that it was held for all those who died in the Troubles.

On leadership, Jeremy has said he sees leadership about listening, not dictating. Listening to what people say, understanding the pressures in their lives and ensuring government policies make a real and positive difference.

Being strong and standing up for people doesn’t mean shouting and dictating. It’s not a sign of strength to cut taxes for the rich and powerful, it’s a sign of weakness. Real strength is standing up to these vested interests and governing for the many not the few.

On small businesses, Labour has pledged they will be protected by reintroducing the lower small profits rate of corporation tax. Labour is the party of small businesses, many of whom are exploited by bigger companies who delay payments to them to maximise their own profits. Labour will declare war on late payment.


On Jeremy Paxman’s questions about Labour’s manifesto 

Labour is a democratic party and our manifesto reflects that. The Tories’ manifesto was compiled by a small group of people around Theresa May, and the chaos and confusion that has ensued as a result reflects that.

On MI5

The claim that John McDonnell wants to disband MI5 is entirely false and based on erroneous reports about an unrelated statement that John signed.

Unlike the Tories that cut the budget for the intelligence services in 2012 and have cut police numbers by 20,000 since 2010, Labour is committed to giving our security services the resources they need and will recruit 10,000 extra police officers.

On Hamas

Jeremy has spent his life campaigning for peace and has been very clear that he does not support Hamas.

Questions Theresa May must now answer:

The Conservative manifesto has betrayed Britain’s pensioners, threatened unspecified tax rises for tens of millions of working people and set out a grim future of underfunding and understaffing for our vital public services.

Theresa May has broken her flagship manifesto pledge on social care and there is confusion over funding for our NHS and schools. She must answer these questions:

  • What will be the cap on social care costs for people with conditions such as dementia, how many pensioners will lose their winter fuel payments, and how will you fund the NHS?
  • Will there be increases in National Insurance contributions and income tax?
  • How will you fund your school breakfast proposal now you have withdrawn the original 6.8p figure?
read more

Theresa May must spell out Tory policies after Dominic Raab gaffe – Ian Lavery

Theresa May must spell out Tory policies after Dominic Raab gaffe

Labour is calling on Theresa May to end the confusion over funding for our NHS and schools after a gaffe by Conservative MP Dominic Raab.

On the Victoria Derbyshire programme this morning, Dominic Raab suggested money for the NHS would be found by cutting free school meals for infants.

When pressed on the issue, he said: “Well, look we’ve said things like means testing the winter fuel payment. I’m giving an illustration of the difficult decisions, like saying that we wouldn’t be subsidising free school lunches for well-off parents, we don’t think that’s the right thing to do. We’d rather the money went into teaching and the NHS.”

The suggestion the NHS would benefit is at odds with the Conservative manifesto, which says: “The savings made from [cutting free school meals] will be added to the core schools budget, meaning that every penny saved will go towards children’s education.”

Meanwhile, the respected Institute for Fiscal Studies has confirmed that there is not a single penny of extra funding for the NHS in the Conservatives’ manifesto.

The latest chaos and confusion about Tory policy comes after the unravelling of their proposal for free school breakfasts, when it was found it would only amount to 6.8p per meal, and the announcement of an unspecified cap on social care costs being charged against people’s homes.

Ahead of tonight’s leaders’ debate and interview with Jeremy Paxman, Labour is challenging Theresa May to end the uncertainty by coming clean on what a Conservative government would mean:

 ·         How many pensioners will lose their winter fuel payments?

·         What will the cap be on social care costs for people with conditions such as dementia?

·         Will there be increases in National Insurance contributions and income tax?

·         Is the Institute for Fiscal Studies right to say there will be five years of austerity for the NHS?

·         How will they fund their school breakfast proposal (replacing free school meals) now their original 6.8p figure is discredited?

Ian Lavery, Labour’s National Election Coordinator, said:

“Theresa May has already thrown millions of pensioners into uncertainty over her dementia tax policy and now her funding for our NHS and schools is in disarray. If even her own spokespeople don’t know where the money is coming from or where it’s going, how on earth do they expect the British people to know?

“You can’t trust a word Theresa May and the Tories say, the flip-flopping and backsliding is getting ridiculous. There is a very clear choice at this election, between a Conservative party that is betraying pensioners, threatening tax rises for millions of families and promising five more years of austerity for our NHS and schools, and a Labour party with a fully costed plan for the many not the few.”

read more