BCC: ‘No deal’ not an option for business communities

Today the BCC publishes the results of a post-election survey on business views on the UK’s objectives in the EU negotiations.

10th July 2017

One month on from the General Election, the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) today (Monday) publishes a post-election survey of over 2,400 companies, which shows that while businesses have a range of views on their preferred objectives for the UK in Brexit negotiations, there is almost no support to conclude UK-EU talks without a trade deal.

Asked to consider which option came closest to their view about what the UK’s Brexit negotiation objectives should be, the survey – carried out just after the election – showed:

  • 2% said leave the Single Market and Customs Union, and rely on WTO rules for trade (leave without a trade deal with the EU)
  • 34% said remain in the Single Market and Customs Union
  • 13% said remain in Customs Union only (no hard borders or tariffs, but limited scope to negotiate trade agreements with third countries)
  • 11% said remain in the Single Market only (accept EU regulations and rules in return for full access to market)
  • 28% said a comprehensive Free Trade Agreement and a customs agreement (the government’s pre-election objectives, set at the Prime Minister’s Lancaster House speech)
  • 12% said don’t know or ‘other’ 

Respondents were also asked about a transition period, and which of the following options they believe is best for their business:

  • 46% said ‘a transition period of three years’
  • 22% said ‘a transition period of longer than three years’
  • 17% said ‘no transition period’
  • 15% said ‘don’t know’ or ‘other’ 

Dr Adam Marshall, Director General of the British Chambers of Commerce (BCC), said:

“Our results make it clear that there are a range of business views on what the UK should be seeking in a final deal with the EU, but there is near-universal consensus that a deep and comprehensive agreement is needed. ‘No deal’ isn’t seen as a viable option. Businesses want a pragmatic settlement on the practical, real-world issues that affect their operations, not arbitrary political red lines. 

“By more than three to one, businesses want a transition period on the way to a final agreement with the EU. This is critical to prevent firms facing the prospect of repeated, costly adjustments to new trading conditions. If companies have to change their business model once in 2019 and again several years thereafter, the competitiveness and investment potential of our firms will be undermined.

“Getting transition arrangements on the negotiations agenda as quickly as possible would give businesses – many of whom are considering big investment decisions now – the confidence to press ahead.” 

Ends

 

Notes to editors:

The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) survey received responses from 2,422 business people from all regions of the UK online between Monday 12 June and Wednesday 14 June 2017. Of the businesses surveyed, 91% were SMEs, 25% operate in the manufacturing sector, and 75% operate in the services sector. The results were weighted to align to the BEIS 2016 business population estimates.

The British Chambers of Commerce (BCC) sits at the heart of a powerful network of 52 Accredited Chambers of Commerce across the UK, representing thousands of businesses of all sizes and within all sectors. Our Global Business Network connects exporters with nearly 40 markets around the world. For more information, visit: www.britishchambers.org.uk

Media contacts:

Orla Hennessy – Press and Communications Officer

020 7654 5813 / 07825746812

Transcript – Morning Doorstop – Hamburg, Germany

PRIME MINISTER: Good morning. As you know last night, the G20 leaders have agreed for the first time very clearly that the rule of law must prevail online as well as offline.

In the lead up to this summit, as you know, I’ve been talking to other leaders about the importance of ensuring that the internet is not used as a vehicle for spreading terrorist propaganda and recruiting people to the Islamist cause. But also that the encryption basis of the internet’s messaging and communications platforms are not used as a means of enabling terrorists to hide in the dark where the law cannot reach them.

And so obviously as you know, this is a complicated issue and contentious in some respects. But it’s good to see that as a result of the arguments that we’ve placed and the unanimity that we’ve built up with other leaders and other nations, that you’ve seen strong language that now enables us to go forward and say to the tech companies, say to Silicon Valley and its emulators, ‘you’ve got to work with us to solve this problem. We cannot allow the internet to be an ungoverned space’.

And so you see that in paragraph 20 of the statement on counterterrorism, it’s very strong language and I’m very pleased that Australia’s been able to play such a leading and influential role in ensuring that we get that, bringing together with one mind, standing together to defeat terrorism.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister what’s your understanding of the language on climate, its understood that it will allow for fossil fuels and technology around fossil fuels to be advised to G20 members, is that your understanding?

PRIME MINISTER: Well I won’t comment on the language until it’s published. But fossil fuels are going to be part of the energy mix of the world for a very long time, nobody disputes that.

The object of climate policy is to reduce net emissions; it’s not to eliminate the burning of all fossil fuels. It’s an obligation to reduce your emissions overall.

Can I say though – thank you for raising climate – because one of the matters I discussed with other leaders yesterday and had some very productive discussions, both in the plenary and in the various discussions around it, was about the importance of storage and the significance of our Snowy Hydro 2.0. There is a lot of interest in that, and the scale of it and the importance of pumped hydro as a means of storing huge amounts of electricity.

I mean just to give you an example the battery that has been announced for South Australia, which we welcome by the way, it’s late, storage was obviously required in South Australia a long time ago, but I’m pleased to see that it’s making that commitment. But that will store about 120 megawatt hours of power, Snowy Hydro 2.0 will store 350,000 megawatt hours, so it gives you an indication of the difference in the scale.

But storage is clearly a very very big part of it, and there is a lot of interest in what we’ve done. In fact I’ve shown the drawings of Snowy Hydro 2.0 on my iPad to quite a few people here who are very interested in it.

JOURNALIST: Just on the South Australian battery, do you congratulate Jay Weatherill on this, do you encourage other states to go down this path?

PRIME MINISTER: Well look yes I’m certainly pleased that he’s made the commitment to do it.

I gave a speech as you may remember in February talking about the importance of storage, plainly that was the big factor that was overlooked again, and I’ve said this at the G20 here.

Energy policy in Australia – national energy policy – is guided under my leadership by engineering and economics, not by ideology and politics, they’re a very poor guide. And South Australia of course has suffered from the very ideological approach to power where they allowed a lot of wind power to be built without taking into account that the wind doesn’t blow all the time and backing it up.

JOURNALIST: What do you think of banning all petrol and diesel cars, France has set a date by 2040.

PRIME MINISTER: I’ve read about that, I’ll be interested to see if it’s achievable. But again, the object has got to be a policy based on engineering and economics and in terms of emissions reductions talking about net reductions in emissions. So that doesn’t mean not burning fossil fuels, I can assure you.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister have you spoken to President Xi?

PRIME MINISTER: Yeah I have spoken to President Xi, yes. I had a good discussion with him since we last met, last night about North Korea and repeated my very grave concerns about the situation there, and why I believe that China has a particular responsibility given the considerable leverage it has.

I’ve also discussed North Korea as you know, further with the Japanese Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, and of course with President Trump, who I spent some more time with last night.

JOURNALIST: And what was his response to your concerns? Are you worried that this request is falling on deaf ears?

PRIME MINISTER: No it’s not falling on deaf ears. I won’t go into the – I’m happy to say what I said but I won’t go into what President Xi said. But I think you can assume that the Chinese position is that the situation is not as straightforward as others assert and that their influence over North Korea is not as great as others assert.

But the fact is, I mean again, I’ll repeat what I’ve said before. We all know North Korea is not a compliant client state like East Germany was to the old Soviet Union. We all understand that. But the fact is, the truth is that China has overwhelming leverage over North Korea. It has the ability to, if it were to impose the economic sanctions thoroughly and greater sanctions, it would be able to put the economic lock on North Korea and that is one way that that regime could be brought to its senses without conflict.

But it is a very grave problem on the Korean Peninsula and China has to step up and take more responsibility.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister you’re off to Paris, can you tell us what your hopes are for that meeting?

PRIME MINISTER: Yes well again we’ve had some very good discussions with the new President of France, Emmanuel Macron and indeed with his wife Brigitte already. The focus will obviously be, all the issues we will be discussing here; trade, counterterrorism, but of course the big defence deal we have with France. The partnership that we’ve entered into to build the future submarines and that will be a major topic of the discussion.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister how significant do you judge the developments between the Russia or US President’s meetings to be, particularly the fact they manage to dodge the common ground on the ceasefire, at least in part in Syria.

PRIME MINISTER: Well I think it is significant, but how significant only time will tell. But again I had the opportunity to have a good review of both the North Korea situation and the progress of discussions with President Putin when I met with President Trump last night.

Look it is a fiendishly complex situation in Syria as everyone here understands. But it will require very intense collaboration between Russia, the United States and indeed the other players in that field who are including of course Turkey, who’s President is also here.

JOURNALIST: PM with the meeting with Mr Trump in the car-

PRIME MINISTER: Yeah – in the beast.

JOURNALIST: What was it like?

PRIME MINISTER: I felt very safe. (Laughter)

JOURNALIST: I understand you’re meeting with President Moon today as well, did you make it or was it apparent to Mr Trump that you’re now in lock step with the US on the North Korean situation and is that a point you will be making today with President Mood? 

PRIME MINISTER: Just ask that question-

JOURNALIST: Is it the case we’re now in lockstep with the US over the Korean situation and is that a point you will be making to President Moon today?

PRIME MINISTER: Yes, my position, Australia’s position on the North Korean situation is the same as that of the United States. Which is that the reckless conduct – illegal conduct in fact – must stop and that this escalation is continuing to threaten world peace.

JOURNALIST: But what’s President Trump going to do about it?

PRIME MINISTER: Well again, this is a developing situation and I’ll let you address that question to him.

But clearly everybody wants this matter to resolved in a peaceful and diplomatic way, and I think you will see clearly an increase in sanctions. But the country with the ability to impose the most severe sanctions and hence the greatest influence on North Korea is obviously China.

JOURNALIST: Can you tell us more about the ride in the beast?

PRIME MINISTER: Well, the ride in the beast, this is the President’s special car.

Well no look, it was very kind of him, we went from a reception to the concert theatre and he and Melania invited Lucy and I to ride with him in the car and it was the opportunity to have a good private discussion about a number of these issues. So look we get on very well, so that’s-

JOURNALIST: And what were those number of issues other than North Korea that were discussed with Trump?

PRIME MINISTER: Really we talked about a number of things including some old mutual friends. So look, President Trump and I get on very well, which is good, I think as is apparent. One more and then I’d better run.

JOURNALIST: Prime Minister, President Macron has a strong economic reform agenda, he wants to overhaul labour laws in France because of the really stubborn unemployment rate there.

PRIME MINISTER: Sure.

JOURNALIST: Is workplace law reform something that you can take some advice from other leaders do you think to bring to back to Australia?

PRIME MINISTER: Well I think a lot of people, the French would love to have workplace laws that were approaching ours, France’s workplace laws are very very inflexible and one of the reasons why they’ve had such stubbornly high unemployment.

One of the other things that President Macron is seeking to do is to reduce company tax, so I’m sure we’ll discuss the progress we’ve had. I mean my government has reduced company tax for companies up to $50 million in turnover as you know, their tax rate is coming down and has in fact up to $25 million it already has come down, and will come down further. So that’s very important part of our economic agenda which is to encourage more investment and hence more employment and Macron-

JOURNALIST: So they can take some advice from Australia, France

PRIME MINISTER: Well it’s not a question of taking advice but you know we all learn from others’ experience. And the truth is that around the world countries are seeking to reduce business tax because they know if you reduce business tax you increase investment, if you increase investment you increase employment.

Everything, every element of my Government’s policy is focused on giving Australians the security they need. We talked about national security a lot this morning and also energy security, but also to provide the economic opportunities they need. And a big part of that is providing incentives for business to invest because if they invest more, they grow more and they employ more and they export more.

So you know whether it is talking about tax reform, whether it’s talking about energy security, whether it’s talking with President Jokowi yesterday about, you know enhancing the free trade relationship with Indonesia to create more opportunities for Indonesians and Australians to do business together, this is all part of what I’m doing here, defending and advancing Australia’s national interest.

Thanks very much. 

In Ukraine, UN chief Guterres urges full respect for ceasefire

9 July 2017 – Speaking to the press in the Ukrainian capital, Kyiv, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres called on all sides to fully respect the ceasefire and underscored the Organization’s support to the country and its people.

&#8220You can be sure that for us this is something that we keep in the agenda. It is not a forgotten situation,&#8221 said Mr. Guterres at a press conference, alongside Petro Poroshenko, the President of Ukraine.

&#8220The human rights bodies of the UN are, of course, active in relation to the situation, and, as it is known, the High Commissioner [for human rights] will be providing also his report on the human rights situation in Crimea in due time,&#8221 he noted.

He added that the UN is ready to support all efforts, including those of the Normandy Four, the Trilateral Contact Group and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).

In his remarks, the Secretary-General also highlighted the UN’s support to humanitarian activities in the country and said that it would enhance its cooperation with the Government and that it will work to overcome any challenges in reaching the populations in distress.

More than 1.7 million people have been displaced in Ukraine since the start of the conflict.

Mr. Guterres also said that UN fully supported the reform process of the Government and that he has closely followed developments in that regard.

&#8220As the President mentioned, we are ready to upscale our cooperation and our presence to support the Government in the reforms that [it] will be promoting,&#8221 he added.

Further in his remarks, the Secretary-General expressed appreciation to the cooperation between Ukraine and the UN as well as the country’s contributions to the UN peacekeeping efforts and to global peace and security as a member of the Security Council.

&#8220Ukraine has been actively engaged in all processes in relation to both peace and security, sustainable and inclusive development, and human rights, and I want to express my deep appreciation for what has been an exemplary cooperation,&#8221 he said.

Also in his remarks, Mr. Guterres recalled his link with the people of Ukraine during his tenure as the UN High Commissioner for Refugees.

&#8220I started to work with them as High Commissioner for Refugees, and I want to say that I deeply feel the suffering of the people and I am deeply committed to do everything I can in order to be able to address their plight,&#8221 he stated.

News story: Defence Secretary welcomes Iraqi Victory in Mosul

Welcoming Prime Minister Abadi’s statement on Mosul, Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon said:

I congratulate Prime Minister Abadi, and the Iraqi forces who have been fighting on the ground with great bravery > and care against a brutal opponent. Daesh has total disregard for innocent civilian life and we should welcome their defeat in a city that was ground zero for their so-called caliphate.

Britain has played a leading role in the Coalition that has helped bring about the removal of the death cult from Mosul. The RAF has struck more than 750 targets as part of the campaign to liberate Mosul – second only to the > United States. While these pin point strikes have brought an end to Daesh in the city, there is still more to do. This > barbaric group remains dug in west of the Euphrates and clearing operations in and around Mosul will be needed > because of the threat from improvised explosive devices.

News story: Defence Secretary welcomes Iraqi Victory in Mosul

Updated: update

Welcoming Prime Minister Abadi’s statement on Mosul, Defence Secretary Sir Michael Fallon said:

I congratulate Prime Minister Abadi, and the Iraqi forces who have been fighting on the ground with great bravery and care against a brutal opponent. Daesh has total disregard for innocent civilian life and we should welcome their defeat in a city that was ground zero for their so-called caliphate.

Britain has played a leading role in the Coalition that has helped bring about the removal of the death cult from Mosul. The RAF has struck more than 750 targets as part of the campaign to liberate Mosul – second only to the United States. While these pin point strikes have brought an end to Daesh in the city, there is still more to do. This barbaric group remains dug in west of the Euphrates and clearing operations in and around Mosul will be needed because of the threat from improvised explosive devices.