Tag Archives: China

image_pdfimage_print

SED on self-financing tertiary institutions

     Following is the transcript of remarks by the Secretary for Education, Mr Kevin Yeung, at a media session after officiating at the launch ceremony of the Citi-HKCSS Community Intern Program today (June 26):
 
Reporter: Mr Yeung, the privately run tertiary institutions have got a sharp increase, but the number of students is going downwards. How does the Government cope with this situation and will the Government consider cancelling some institutions’ licences if the privately run institutions are not up to standard?
 
Secretary for Education: I think that it involves two issues here. The first one is that we already know the number of students or DSE (Diploma of Secondary Education) graduates will be decreasing in the coming years. All self-financing institutions already know this fact, and we are expecting that there will be some sort of consolidation anyway in the coming years.
 
     But the question posed by the Task Force (on Review of Self-financing Post-secondary Education) is whether we should have a requirement on the quality of the institutions after registration, whether they have achieved what they have already planned. So that is another issue. From that angle, it is more about the quality issue rather than an issue about the number of candidates.
 
(Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the transcript.) read more

Illegal worker jailed

     A Nepalese illegal worker holding a recognisance form was jailed at Shatin Magistrates’ Courts yesterday (June 25).
 
     During a joint operation conducted by the Immigration Department (ImmD), the Hong Kong Police Force and the Labour Department codenamed “Champion” on May 17, enforcement officers raided a restaurant in Sheung Wan. A male Nepalese illegal worker, aged 29, was arrested. When intercepted he was serving customers. Upon identity checking, he produced for inspection a recognisance form issued by the ImmD, which prohibits him from taking employment. Further investigation revealed that he was a non-refoulement claimant.
 
     The illegal worker was charged at Shatin Magistrates’ Courts yesterday with taking employment after landing in Hong Kong unlawfully and remaining in Hong Kong without the authority of the Director of Immigration or while being a person in respect of whom a removal order or deportation order was in force. After trial, he was sentenced to 15 months’ imprisonment.
 
     The ImmD spokesman warned that, as stipulated in section 38AA of the Immigration Ordinance, illegal immigrants or people who are the subject of a removal order or a deportation order are prohibited from taking any employment, whether paid or unpaid, or establishing or joining in any business. Offenders are liable upon conviction to a maximum fine of $50,000 and up to three years’ imprisonment. The Court of Appeal has issued a guideline ruling that a sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment should be applied in such cases.
 
     The spokesman reiterated that it is a serious offence to employ people who are not lawfully employable. The maximum penalty is imprisonment for three years and a fine of $350,000. The High Court has laid down sentencing guidelines that the employer of an illegal worker should be given an immediate custodial sentence. According to the court sentencing, employers must take all practicable steps to determine whether a person is lawfully employable prior to employment. Apart from inspecting a prospective employee’s identity card, the employer has the explicit duty to make enquiries regarding the person and ensure that the answers would not cast any reasonable doubt concerning the lawful employability of the person. The court will not accept failure to do so as a defence in proceedings. It is also an offence if an employer fails to inspect the job seeker’s valid travel document if the job seeker does not have a Hong Kong permanent identity card. The maximum penalty for failing to inspect such a document is imprisonment for one year and a fine of $150,000.
  
     Under the existing mechanism, the ImmD will, as a standard procedure, conduct initial screening on vulnerable persons, including illegal workers, illegal immigrants, sex workers and foreign domestic helpers, who are arrested during any operation, with a view to ascertaining whether they are trafficking in persons (TIP) victims. When any TIP indicator is revealed in the initial screening, the officers will conduct a full debriefing and identification by using a standardised checklist to ascertain the presence of TIP elements, such as threat and coercion in the recruitment phase and the nature of exploitation. Identified TIP victims will be provided with various forms of support and assistance, including urgent interference, medical services, counselling, shelter, temporary accommodation and other supporting services. The ImmD calls on TIP victims to report crimes to the relevant departments. read more

Ombudsman invites public views on Education Bureau’s mechanism for approving applications for school fee revision

The following is issued on behalf of the Office of The Ombudsman:
 
     The Ombudsman, Ms Connie Lau, today (June 26) invited members of the public to provide information and/or views on the mechanism of the Education Bureau (EDB) for approving applications for school fee revision.
 
     According to information published by the EDB in September 2017, a total of 147 Direct Subsidy Scheme (DSS)/private/international schools had been granted approval by the EDB to increase their school fees for the 2017/18 school year. Some schools charge an annual school fee of over $200,000. The EDB says that it has established procedures for approving applications for school fee revision submitted by DSS/private/international schools. Nevertheless, there are concerns in the community that the bureau’s approval mechanism is lax and lacks transparency, such that those schools can often easily obtain approval to raise their school fees, thereby placing a heavy financial burden on parents.
 
     Ms Lau said, “Parents have been relying on the EDB to scrutinise the schools’ budgets and their justifications for fee increase. The bureau should ensure that the levels of fee increase are reasonable and protect the interests of students and their parents. If schools are at liberty to unreasonably hike their school fees year after year, that would bring about a heavy financial burden for parents to bear. We are, therefore, very concerned about whether the EDB has in place a sufficiently strict mechanism and proper procedures for approving applications for school fee revision.”
 
     The Office of The Ombudsman has initiated a direct investigation into the EDB’s criteria and procedures for approving applications for school fee revision, and the bureau’s regulatory system for school fees collected by schools. The Office will also examine whether there are inadequacies in the EDB’s current approval mechanism and administrative procedures, with a view to making recommendations to the bureau for improvement.
 
     To make the investigation more comprehensive, The Ombudsman now invites members of the public, particularly parents, parents’ associations, the education sector and sponsoring bodies, to send information and/or views in writing to the Office of The Ombudsman by July 26, 2018:
 
Address: 30/F, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre, 168-200 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong
Fax: 2882 8149
Email: complaints@ombudsman.hk read more