Press release: Poisons from cigarettes reach major body organs in seconds
Public Health England’s new TV advert highlights the dangers of tar in cigarettes, urging England’s 7 million smokers to quit using Smokefree this New Year. read more
Public Health England’s new TV advert highlights the dangers of tar in cigarettes, urging England’s 7 million smokers to quit using Smokefree this New Year. read more
Councils across the country are being forced to spend their own resources tackling the effects of Universal Credit and preparing for its roll out.
FOI requests submitted by Labour reveal Councils are committing funds towards offsetting and preparing for the impact of Universal Credit over and above Discretionary Housing Payments provided by the Department for Work and Pensions.
The data shows some Councils are having to provide additional rent arrears support and increase staffing as well as working with their local food banks and Citizens Advice to offset the impact of Universal Credit.
Newcastle City Council is spending nearly £400,000 of its own resources supporting UC claimants, almost a quarter of which comes from additional rent arrears support. That’s because the non-collection of rent purely as a result of UC is over £1.2 million across a tenancy base of just 27,000.
In London, Tower Hamlets Council has set aside £5 million over three years to help those affected by Universal Credit and are suffering hardship while Barking and Dagenham is budgeting £50,000 to support UC claimants from January 2018.
Examples of Councils needing, and preparing, to commit resources to offset the impact of Universal Credit (UC) include:
· Bath and North East Somerset Council plans to spend its allocation of Discretionary Housing Payments. So far in 2017, nearly three quarters of its DHP spend has gone to supporting claimants in receipt of UC.
· Bolton Council has a £750,000 Local Welfare Provision Scheme and a ring-fenced budget of £1.5 million over a five year period to tackle poverty.
· Bournemouth Borough Council has recently commissioned a £10,000 annual service from the Citizen’s Advice Bureaux to provide 2 days a week drop-in to help those people either claiming UC for the first time or who are experiencing problems with applying.
· Brent Council is anticipating “additional demands on a number of Council departments” from the introduction of UC.
· Cheshire West and Chester Council is spending more than £500,000 this year and next on additional staffing. It also has a budget of £60,000 for Discretionary Hardship Payments.
· City of Wolverhampton Council expects demand for Discretionary Housing Payments to increase following the expansion of UC during December.
· Cornwall Council is predicting an increase in the number of people needing personal budget support for UC from 37 in December 2017 to 191 in March 2018, a rise of 416%.
· Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council has increased staffing in its Income Management Team by £500,000 in the last three years to manage the impact of UC and other welfare reforms.
· Gateshead Housing Company, which manages Gateshead Council’s housing stock, is planning to spend an estimated £90,000 in 2017/18 and £270,000 in 2018/19 on additional staffing to support Universal Credit claimants and help prevent rent arrears.
· Halton Borough Council has spent over £13,000 supporting UC claimants who have experienced delays receiving their first UC payment and those having budgeting issues.
· Haringey Council has a fund of up to £900,000 to support families affected by welfare reform.
· Lambeth Council is spending £775,000 providing advice to residents about social security, debt and money issues. Lambeth Housing are spending £87,000 to provide a supportive service for tenants impacted by welfare reform.
· Liverpool City Council has spent £175,000 from its Local Welfare Provision Scheme for customers in receipt of UC.
· London Borough of Barking and Dagenham is budgeting £50,000 to support UC claimants from January 2018.
· London Borough of Bexley is spending £200,000 on homeless prevention work, including preventing evictions for rent arrears.
· Newcastle City Council is spending over £390,000 of its own resources to support UC claimants. That includes £88,000 in rent arrears support as to date the non-collection of rent purely as a result of UC is over £1.2 million across a tenancy base of just 27,000.
· Royal Borough of Kingston Council is setting aside £181,000 as “bad debt provision in anticipation of the potential increase in the number and value of bad debt write offs”.
· Sheffield City Council is holding workshops to prepare for the full roll out of UC. The Council is working on the “understanding from other authorities who have already gone through full roll-out of UC […] that rent arrears double when tenants move onto UC.”
· Shropshire Council has spent over £20,000 supporting local foodbanks to “diversify the type of help they are able to give specifically to suit Universal Credit.”
· Sunderland City Council is using resources from a £250,000 Local Welfare Provision Scheme to support residents claiming UC.
· Telford & Wrekin Council is using resources from its Welfare Crisis Assistance Scheme to prevent tenants from being evicted due to rent arrears caused by UC.
· Tower Hamlets Council has allocated £5 million over three years “to help those affected by Universal Credit and are suffering hardship”.
· Wakefield Council has used a further £2,000 from their Local Welfare Provision to support UC claimants.
· Warrington Borough Council has spent £6,500 in Local Welfare Support payments supporting UC claimants.
· Waltham Forest Council has arranged staff training on UC and is planning a £17,000 6-month project management resource to help prepare for the introduction of UC. It is also hosting a seminar on how UC will change the way staff need to work, the cost of which is £1,700.
· Wirral Council is contributing nearly £300,000 to a budget for Discretionary Housing Payments for applicants who receive Housing Benefit or housing costs within UC.
Margaret Greenwood MP, Labour’s Shadow Minister for Employment, said:
“Universal Credit is causing misery and hardship for thousands of families this Christmas, and Councils are being expected to pick up the pieces.
“It’s clear Councils are committing their own valuable resources from already-stretched budgets to offset the impact of Universal Credit and to prepare for the damage its roll out could cause.
“This is yet more evidence that the Government should immediately pause the roll out of Universal Credit so its fundamental flaws can be fixed.”
read moreI had hoped with Guest editors the Today programme would seek to reconnect for just a day or two with the taxpayers, motorists and Eurosceptics it regularly castigates the rest of the year. I should have known better. This morning they have just given an interview with an “expert” who told them that people voting for “populist” parties threatened the underpinnings of liberal democracy in Europe. So there we have it. People voting against the EU and Euro establishment in their countries are anti democratic forces. Why wasn’t the expert asked why in the EU you are only allowed to vote for what the Establishment thinks is right? Why do voters have to vote again when they get the answer to referendums wrong according to the Establishment? What should voters do when traditional parties remain wedded to Euro austerity policies?
read moreThere’s a surprise! The release of government documents includes delays to the release of European Exchange Rate Mechanism papers and a block on the release of certain Euro papers relating to 1992 when we dropped out of the European Exchange Rate Mechanism. This was the biggest economic policy error of the last quarter of the twentieth century in the UK. The Establishment and main political parties united to visit this disaster on us. It led to falling house prices, a big rise in unemployment, closed factories, bankrupt businesses, all in the name of European integration. The irony is it delivered what Project Fear wrongly said our vote to leave the EU would deliver in the winter of 2016-17! No wonder the Remain establishment is shy about revealing more of what happened then.
read moreI was surprised by the way several contributors misread yesterday’s post. It was a piece about how technology and changing lifestyles might affect personal transport in the future. It was not an attack upon personal choice or on the motorist. Use of a car is essential for most people today to get them to work or their children to school or to go to the shops. It is only in large cities like London where public transport offers a frequent and flexible service that more people find it practical to do without owning a car.
The government does need to do more to improve road safety and reduce congestion. I have sought to show how these twin aims can be mutually reinforcing and need not be in conflict in the way some suggest.
Short term and relatively cheap options include permitting and encouraging more off road parking, optimising phasing on traffic lights, creating segregated right hand turning lanes, and creating more pavements and cycleways away from main vehicle carriageways.
Dearer options include bypasses, more bridges over railway lines and rivers which act as barriers cutting road capacity especially into towns and cities.
The highways authorities need to offer safer and better solutions for school set down and pick up instead of encouraging parking on busy roads close to schools at peak times of day. They need to use more roundabouts and fewer light sets. They should require replacement and new utility pipes and cables to be laid away from the main highway in accessible conduits to stop the need to dig up the road for naintenance and replacement.
The government is asking each Highways authority to identify and improve a local strategic road network. This is a good initiative with money for suitable improvement projects.
read more