Correctional officers stop remand person in custody attacking staff

     â€‹Correctional officers at Lai Chi Kok Reception Centre stopped a male remand person in custody attacking staff yesterday (January 4).

     At 7.11pm yesterday, the 36-year-old male remand person in custody suddenly became emotional and attacked two correctional officers with his hands inside a cell. The officers at the scene immediately stopped him and called for reinforcement.

     During the incident, an officer sustained injuries to his head and leg while another officer sustained injury to his head. After examination and treatment at the institution hospital, they were referred to a public hospital for further treatment. The assailant did not sustain any injury.

     The case has been reported to the Police for investigation.

     The assailant was remanded for the offence of possession of offensive weapon in a public place.




Continuation of epidemic prevention measures for LegCo Secretariat

The following is issued on behalf of the Legislative Council Secretariat:
 
     In view of the latest situation of the COVID-19 epidemic, the Legislative Council (LegCo) Secretariat (Secretariat) will continue to arrange staff to work from home until January 20, except those who are responsible for servicing Council meetings or committee meetings and maintaining basic operation of the Secretariat, and those performing on-site duties.
 
     Meanwhile, the Secretariat will maintain all the existing epidemic prevention measures and special arrangements. For details, please refer to the announcement on the LegCo Website (www.legco.gov.hk/general/english/sec/corg_ser/whats_on_20210105-e.pdf).
 
     The Secretariat will closely monitor the development of the epidemic and review the measures to make further announcements in due course.




Latest arrangements for Marine Department services

     In light of the announcement of the Government today (January 5) that the special work arrangements for government employees will be extended until January 20, a spokesman for the Marine Department (MD) announced that the licensing and port formalities services at the Yau Ma Tei Marine Office, the Tuen Mun Marine Office, the Sai Kung Marine Office, the Tai Po Marine Office, the Aberdeen Marine Office, the Cheung Chau Marine Office and the Shau Kei Wan Marine Office; the seafarers' examination and certification services; mercantile marine services; and local vessel surveying and enquiry services will continue to be suspended until January 20. Those who have made an appointment for services or examinations will be separately informed of alternative arrangements.

     The licensing and port formalities services at the Central Marine Office and other services provided by the MD will remain unaffected.




Land Registry releases statistics for December 2020

     The Land Registry today (January 5) released its statistics for December 2020.
 
Land registration
——————-

* The number of sale and purchase agreements for all building units received for registration in December was 7,596 (+4.9 per cent compared with November and +94.4 per cent compared with December 2019)

* The 12-month moving average for December was 6,110 (5.3 per cent above the 12-month moving average for November but 2.0 per cent below that for December 2019)

* The total consideration for sale and purchase agreements in December was $70.3 billion (+6.6 per cent compared with November and +100.7 per cent compared with December 2019)

* Among the sale and purchase agreements, 6,067 were for residential units (-0.05 per cent compared with November but +90.5 per cent compared with December 2019)

* The total consideration for sale and purchase agreements in respect of residential units was $58.7 billion (+1.1 per cent compared with November and +87.9 per cent compared with December 2019)

     Statistics on sales of residential units do not include sale and purchase agreements relating to sales of units under the Home Ownership Scheme, the Private Sector Participation Scheme and the Tenants Purchase Scheme unless the premium of the unit concerned has been paid after the sale restriction period.

     Figures on sale and purchase agreements received for the past 12 months, the year-on-year rate of change and breakdown figures on residential sales have also been released.

     As deeds may not be lodged with the Land Registry until up to 30 days after the transaction, these statistics generally relate to land transactions in the previous month.
 
Land search
————–                                                             
 
* The number of searches of land registers made by the public in December was 411,759 (-8.5 per cent compared with November but +12.6 per cent compared with December 2019)

    The statistics cover searches made at the counter, through the self-service terminals and via the Integrated Registration Information System Online Services.




Transcript of remarks by CE at media session before ExCo meeting (with video)

     Following is the transcript of remarks by the Chief Executive, Mrs Carrie Lam at a media session before the Executive Council meeting today (January 5):
 
Reporter: Question number one, for how long will the Government refuse the Hong Kong residents who are stuck in UK from returning home which they are fully entitled to, according to the Basic Law, especially as you have said that the measures to prevent imported cases are now watertight? And question number two, the Transport Department has offered a new service to car owners that will alert them if someone makes a search on their vehicles. Do you agree this sort of action from the Government is not very media friendly and will this sort of tip-off service be extended to other public services like land and company searches? And why can't the media be exempted from this if the purpose is for news gathering? The final question is regarding recently the state media and also some local media have attacked a High Court judge for granting bail to Jimmy Lai, with some critics saying this sort of attacks actually put pressure on the Judiciary ahead of an appeal hearing. Can you tell us why the Government didn't issue a statement to hit back at these sort of comments? Is it because they are from the state media? Thank you.
 
Chief Executive: Thank you for the three questions. First is I have just emphasised the importance of having watertight measures in ensuring that Hong Kong will not import confirmed cases from all over the world because the COVID-19 situation is still very severe in many parts of the world. The United Kingdom and South Africa now are two of the high-risk places because of this new variant in the virus, and so for a while, many places – it's not just Hong Kong – have suspended flights from the United Kingdom because of this worry. You cannot blame those places including Hong Kong because the then-situation was very severe when we were told that this virus was 70 per cent more infectious, when we were told by the relevant minister in the United Kingdom government that it was almost out of control. If it was almost out of control in the United Kingdom and the receiving places like Hong Kong – we do have a lot of returnees from the United Kingdom accounting for about one third of arrivals at Hong Kong International Airport – if we did nothing, you imagine, it would be putting our city at great risk. So we have to take this measure, which was very difficult, because it involves Hong Kong residents and many of them are students or parents who have gone to visit the students and they need to come back. The Immigration Department have received about 190 requests for assistance. The Government will seriously look into the situation and see whether we could make some adjustments later on, but as far as I’m aware even the major airline flying between Hong Kong and London has suspended their flights until some time this month so we will together review the situation.
 
     The second question is about Transport Department or about these so-called public registers where members of public could apply to inspect by paying a fee in most circumstances. We have to understand the purpose of allowing members of public to inspect these personal data held by the Government when that particular person came up to apply for something, whether it is a car license or they do a land transaction or they register a company so they have these personal data with us. As a government body we have to be responsible in ensuring the privacy of these persons, especially after what we have seen in the past one to two years that many people, when inspecting these public registers, got hold of the personal data and did all sorts of intimidation, doxxing that would harm the people. The administrative measure taken by the Transport Department is no more than just to alert the person that somebody has checked your personal data. That's it. I really don't see how this will undermine the work of the media and hence I do not see why media should be exempted from the administrative procedure that the Transport Department has put in place. Now I can tell you that other departments which possess public registers are reviewing along the same line, that whether they need to put in administrative measures taking into account the legal provisions as well as the nature of the registers that they are holding.
 
     Myself and the Secretary for Justice have time and again made public statements that we should respect the Judiciary, we should uphold judicial independence, we should not criticise judges for their decisions without any grounds or facts, that is, pure allegations. Similarly we condemn any such personal attacks on the judges. But if there are people who want to express a view based on their understanding of the law and the facts and the evidence, then this is what the media always advocate – this is a freedom of speech. I really would not see how these comments would put pressure on the Judiciary. I understand the departing Chief Justice may be holding a press conference later today. I'm sure if you ask him he will say the same. Every judge has taken a judicial oath and they would not be intimidated or undermined by these comments in their impartiality in adjudicating cases on the basis of the facts and the evidence before them, so there is no worry of that sort of situation.
 
(Please also refer to the Chinese portion of the transcript.)