Girls in Wiltshire schools come up with innovative solutions for a sustainable world

Staff from the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory supported girls in Wiltshire schools in the annual Soroptimists STEM Challenge trophy.

Dstl provided STEM Ambassadors as judges and mentors for the schools during the project, and attended the awards event with a display to discuss careers with the girls.

The teams, from Years 8 and 9, were asked to research what simple sustainable innovation could make life better for people living in poverty in the developing world. They were challenged to design and create a prototype for a sustainable innovation that could improve the lifestyle of people living in the third world.

Dstl STEM Ambassador Lisa Scandling, Chairman of the Judges and President Elect of the new Salisbury Soroptimist Club said:

I believe it is important for Dstl to support initiatives to encourage young people, particularly girls, to consider careers in STEM. Through the STEM ambassador scheme within Dstl, this challenge allowed Dstl mentors to work in schools alongside the teams supporting, guiding and encouraging them.

Their ideas, knowledge about the world and research skills are just incredible – they are so much better than I remember being at their age! If we have encouraged even a fraction of the girls there to consider the range of possible futures in STEM, then I think we have done well.

The team ‘Fresher, Faster Water Supplies’ from South Wilts Grammar School won the STEM Challenge trophy and cash prizes for themselves and their school at this year’s award ceremony. Some 21 girls across five teams from three schools entered the competition, now in its second year, to encourage local girls to consider careers in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM).

The winning team focused on providing eco-friendly and sustainable water supplies to Yemen with their entry, which made use of aluminium piping and solar powered batteries to power the generator to pump the water. The girls said:

We chose Yemen because it is one of the most water-deprived countries in the world and does not have an irrigation system in place.

Judges were Cerys Rees, Fellow at Dstl, Helen Harrison, Deputy Head of Electrical Engineering and Construction at Wiltshire College and Rhian Griffith, Design Engineer at Gilo Industries.

The judges also selected a runner-up team, Starchy St Ed’s of St Edmund’s Girls School, who they felt showed a strong approach to project planning and research through several experiments. They paid tribute to all five teams for their “high level of presentation, the level of research and the dedication of time that each team had put in and the teamwork shown.”

The other schools’ finalists were:

‘Tomorrow’s Masterminds’ and ‘Dauntsey’s Team 2’ from Dauntsey’s School and ‘SITNC’ from St Edmund’s Girls School .

The third Salisbury STEM Challenge will start in September 2019, and girls in KS 3&4 in local schools have until February 2020 half term to develop their entries.

More information on Salisbury Soroptomists

Help us improve GOV.UK

To help us improve GOV.UK, we’d like to know more about your visit today. We’ll send you a link to a feedback form. It will take only 2 minutes to fill in. Don’t worry we won’t send you spam or share your email address with anyone.

Email address

Send me the survey Don’t have an email address?

Charity Commission reports on its inquiry into Relief for Distressed Children and Young People

A statutory inquiry into a poverty charity has found breaches of trust and duty by trustees who misapplied charity funds and failed to manage conflicts of interest. As a result of the investigation, over £13 million has been distributed to charities and the charity’s former chair has been disqualified, following his removal, from serving as a charity trustee or holding any senior management function of any charity in England and Wales.

The Commission opened a statutory inquiry into Relief for Distressed Children and Young People in 2006 after concerns were raised about its management and administration. On opening the inquiry, the Commission took protective action to freeze access to c. £13.8 million held across 3 bank accounts in the charity’s name.

The inquiry questioned the trustees about $6.35 million which they claimed had been spent on building orphanages in Iraq. Investigators examined letters, photographs and detailed plans of building work. It later materialised that over $5 million had been passed to non-charitable organisations or friends and family of the trustees in Iraq.

Funds equivalent to those misapplied, plus interest, were quickly repaid into the charity’s bank accounts by the trustees. The inquiry considered this an admission by the trustees that funds had been misapplied.

In 2007, the Commission suspended the trustees pending consideration of their removal. The chair was removed in September 2007. The remaining trustees were discharged from their roles in 2008.

The charity’s funds remained protected by Orders of the Commission. As a result of the trustees’ conduct a potential tax liability of up to £3.5 million was identified. With no trustees remaining, the inquiry appointed an interim manager to take over the administration of the charity, settle any tax liability and make a determination on the charity’s future.

As a result, between 2011 and 2016 the interim manager awarded grants of over £13 million to three charities working in Iraq to relieve poverty.

By this point the inquiry had found clear misconduct and/or mismanagement by the former trustees, including their:

• failure to act in accordance with the prohibition in the charity’s trust deed on the trustees receiving financial benefit;
• provision of false and/or misleading information to the Commission;
• misapplication of the charity’s assets;
• little or no knowledge of the financial controls and activities of the charity; and
• failure to manage conflicts of interest.

After settling any outstanding liabilities, the interim manager applied the charity’s remaining funds before dissolving it. The charity was removed from the Register of Charities on 1 March 2019.

Michelle Russell, Director of Investigations, Monitoring and Enforcement at the Charity Commission said:

Our inquiry has relentlessly pursued these funds so that a significant sum could be safeguarded and applied to good causes.

A series of actions by the former trustees allowed charitable funds to be misapplied and put at risk. Our protective action ensured they put right their mistakes and have been held to account for their actions.

As regulator, we want to see charity thrive. This case highlights the lengths we will go to address misconduct and/or mismanagement in charities and protect charity property and assets so that the sector can inspire trust.

The full report of the inquiry is available on GOV.UK.

Ends.

Notes to editors

1. It is an offence under section 60 of the Charities Act 2011 to knowingly or recklessly provide the Commission with false or misleading information.
2. By virtue of his removal, the chair is disqualified from acting as a charity trustee or in a senior management function of any charity in England and Wales without a waiver from disqualification from the Commission or the Court. The charity’s former chair is listed on the register of disqualified individuals maintained by the Commission.