Organised by the Office for Product Safety and Standards (OPSS), the Awards recognise regulatory organisations, individuals, businesses and trade associations that have achieved positive outcomes through good practice.

OPSS Chief Executive Graham Russell said: “All the entries show the immense hard work being put in by regulatory teams across the UK, and our judges faced a considerable challenge in deciding which ones demonstrated that extra bit of spark or innovation to put them through to the final.

“The finalists range from small Trading Standards teams to National Regulators to large and small businesses, and getting to this stage is a mark of merit in itself. Our external judging panel will have quite a task in choosing those finalists that are outstanding.”

The finalists are:

Better Business for All

• Health and Safety Executive
• Cornwall Council
• Leicester and Leicestershire BBfA Partnership
• West of England BBfA partnership
• BBfA Humber Partnership
• Greater Manchester Regulatory Centre of Excellence
• New Anglia Compliance Partnership

Innovation and Technical

• Credas
• Antrim and Newtonabbey Food Safety Team
• SA Brain & Company Ltd
• Dr Chris Robertson / Dr Paul Goodman of RINA
• Paul Owen / West Midlands Fire Service Engineering Team
• Shield Safety Group
• Food Standards Agency Strategic Surveillance Team
• Board Intelligence
• Edinburgh Trading Standards

Primary Authority

• Business Advice and Support Partnership
• SA Brain & Company Ltd
• Wine & Spirit Trade Association /Greater Manchester Regulatory Centre of Excellence
• Peterborough City Council Regulatory Services
• Wakefield Council and Wm Morrison Supermarkets plc
• Kent County Council Trading Standards Business Advice Services / Independent British Vape Trade Association

Product Safety

• Leicestershire Trading Standards
• Buckinghamshire & Surrey Trading Standards/ Solution EU Ltd
• Hillingdon Ports Team
• The Ladder Association
• Jerry Burnie, Wendy Phillips and Eric Edmonds – British Toy and Hobby Ass.
• Amazon UK
• Electrical Safety First
• Environmental Health Consumer Protection (EHNI CP) Subgroup
• City of Wolverhampton
• Hertfordshire Trading Standards
• British Standards Institution

The winners will be announced on June 20, at the offices of Gowling WLG in London. For updates, search on Twitter #RegEx19 and follow @OfficeforSandS.

The Senior Traffic Commissioner for Great Britain has today (29 May 2019) called on professional drivers, commercial vehicle operators, legal representatives and road safety stakeholders to take part in a review of guidance on the conduct of drivers.

The consultation looks at the Commissioner’s existing statutory document for vocational licence holders and proposes a number of changes.

• the starting points for taking action against professional drivers
• cases involving Armed Service Personnel
• case examples of how drivers will be dealt with

The purpose of the driver conduct process is to ensure lorry, bus and coach drivers are fit to drive large commercial vehicles.

Traffic commissioners are responsible for regulating these drivers and can take action against them for failing to meet the relevant standards.

The statutory document helps traffic commissioners to be consistent in their decision-making and contains useful information for drivers and those who employ them.

Senior Traffic Commissioner for Great Britain, Richard Turfitt, said:

“Our aim is to provide clear guidance and continue to improve transparency in the way we come to our decisions. Without a framework, we would not be in a position to ensure consistent and fair regulation of the transport industry or to continue to modernise the licensing regime.

“I encourage professional drivers and their employees, as well as our other key stakeholders, to review our proposals and give us feedback on the intended changes.”

The consultation runs until 23 July 2019.

Diamond boss disqualified for 11 years after falsifying high-end jewellery sales invoices worth $1.75 million.

Jan Maarten Asscher (56), of Roosendaal, Holland, signed a disqualification undertaking and is banned from running limited companies for 11 years.

He is joined by his fellow director, Mark Timothy Walker (57), of Ware, who is banned for 9 years after he allowed the company to produce the false sales documents.

With over 70 years’ diamond-trading experience between them, the pair are banned from directly or indirectly becoming involved, without the permission of the court, in the promotion, formation or management of a company.

Clarity Diamonds was incorporated in February 2014 to trade in wholesale diamonds. The company, however, entered into Creditors Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) in June 2017, after it could not pay debts worth more than £1.2 million.

An investigation was launched into the conduct of the directors and established Jan Asscher had caused the company to falsify invoices relating to bespoke, diamond jewellery. The value stated on the invoices came to US$1.75 million in total.

The documents, which Jan Asscher referred to as ’holding invoices’, were generated with names and addresses that reflected neither the ultimate recipient nor the full value of the order. This meant liquidators could not even trace the pieces to recover them for the benefit of creditors.

Enquiries also revealed that Mark Walker had allowed the inaccurate documents to be produced.

Marc Symons, Deputy Head of Insolvent Investigations, said:

Directors have a duty to maintain accurate records. In this case, the false invoices have resulted in outstanding debts to creditors of more than £1.1 million.

These experienced diamond dealers have received substantial bans, and this should serve as a warning to others who are remiss in their director’s responsibilities.

Jan Maarten Asscher is of Roosendaal, Netherlands and his date of birth is September 1962. His disqualification is effective from 5 April 2019.

Mark Walker is of Ware, Hertfordshire and his date of birth is June 1961. His disqualification is effective from 9 May 2019.

Clarity Diamonds Ltd (Company number: 08893689).

A disqualification undertaking/order has the effect that without specific permission of a court, a person with a disqualification cannot:

• act as a director of a company
• take part, directly or indirectly, in the promotion, formation or management of a company or limited liability partnership
• be a receiver of a company’s property

Disqualification undertakings are the administrative equivalent of a disqualification order but do not involve court proceedings.

Persons subject to a disqualification order are bound by a range of other restrictions.

Further information about the work of the Insolvency Service, and how to complain about financial misconduct, is available.

You can also follow the Insolvency Service on:

UK aid to the World Health Organisation will address urgent gaps in trauma and emergency care, including by establishing a new limb reconstruction unit.